{"id":11,"date":"2005-05-05T10:56:37","date_gmt":"2005-05-05T17:56:37","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=11"},"modified":"2005-05-09T09:43:53","modified_gmt":"2005-05-09T16:43:53","slug":"babies-and-bathwater","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2005\/05\/05\/babies-and-bathwater\/","title":{"rendered":"Babies and Bathwater"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When I tried to post part of the previous postings as a comment on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.downes.ca\/news\/OLDaily.htm\">Stephen&#8217;s Web<\/a>, I was told:<br \/>\n&#8220;Because it has submitted spam, this client has been banned from all interactive features of this website. Email the administrator if you believe this to be in error&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Now I really dislike spam, so being accused of submitting it quite put me off.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I believe that this happened because I had first attempted to preview a version of the comment which included a url for my own full posting.  Although that may not have been wise &#8211; and may even have been contrary to advice on Stephen&#8217;s website (I haven&#8217;t checked but I can well imagine a &#8216;no urls&#8217; rule), I was a bit upset at the accusatory language.<\/p>\n<p>When I brought this to Stephen&#8217;s attention he kindly offered to insert the comment manually, and in any case I have no quarrel with his right to restrict comments on whatever grounds he sees fit, but perhaps there<\/p>\n<p>I do understand the problem with spammers, having had to shut down the comments feature of the LFA website, and so my &#8216;complaint&#8217; was more with the wording of the error message, &#8216;because it has submitted spam&#8217;, than with the fact of being blocked.  <\/p>\n<p>Perhaps we all need to keep in mind when we vent our frustration with spammers that not everything that smells like spam really is spam and so, when rejecting a smelly offering we should try to avoid accusing the purveyor of having poisonous intentions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I tried to post part of the previous postings as a comment on Stephen&#8217;s Web, I was told: &#8220;Because it has submitted spam, this client has been banned from all interactive features of this website. Email the administrator if &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2005\/05\/05\/babies-and-bathwater\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology","category-web"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}