{"id":1248,"date":"2011-02-21T00:46:11","date_gmt":"2011-02-21T07:46:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/?p=1248"},"modified":"2011-02-21T00:46:11","modified_gmt":"2011-02-21T07:46:11","slug":"the-belief-instinct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2011\/02\/21\/the-belief-instinct\/","title":{"rendered":"“The Belief Instinct”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jesse Bering’s “The Belief Instinct”<\/a> is described as an exploration of possible sources of religion in cognitive tendencies towards a sense of being observed even when we have no evidence for it. To support this idea he reportedly both cites experimental evidence and postulates evolutionary explanations – which lead him to identify “adaptive illusion” as being behind the development of religion in our species (but I suspect what he means is \u00a0that it is just a susceptibility to \u00a0illusions of being monitored rather than any specific illusion itself that may be innate).<\/p>\n

Apostate Theocon\u00a0Damon Linker<\/a>, writing in The New Republic<\/a>, finds all this “marvelously informative and endlessly infuriating<\/span>“. He says he does not like the mix of \u00a0“experimental data about modern civilized human beings and groundless speculation about our evolutionary ancestors<\/span>“, but what he is most upset about is his belief that if we accept Bering’s thesis then a “possible consequence is that we will take his arguments to heart and seek to live truthfully, without illusions\u2014which in this case is to say, without shame.” And by the end of the review has worked himself up into quite a state of angry confusion and despair. But I think he misunderstands the implications. Giving up and\/or resisting the illusion of oversight by an external god-like being does not mean giving up the moral values that entity is presumed to enforce (or the fear of incurring our own self-disapproval and\/or of having bad behaviour noted and reported to our peers). So there is no reason to believe that we must either “<\/span>begin shamelessly shitting on ourselves in public<\/span>” or be subject to “<\/span>sustained, ongoing, irredeemable self-deception<\/span>“. There really is an honourable and moral alternative.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jesse Bering’s “The Belief Instinct” is described as an exploration of possible sources of religion in cognitive tendencies towards a sense of being observed even when we have no evidence for it. To support this idea he reportedly both cites … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[109,33,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution","category-psychology","category-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1248"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1249,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1248\/revisions\/1249"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}