{"id":1374,"date":"2011-06-29T19:18:39","date_gmt":"2011-06-30T02:18:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/?p=1374"},"modified":"2011-06-30T02:42:39","modified_gmt":"2011-06-30T09:42:39","slug":"sustainable-energy-choices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2011\/06\/29\/sustainable-energy-choices\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustainable Energy Choices"},"content":{"rendered":"

Barry Brooks at ‘BraveNewClimate’ has made a brave effort at summing up the need for nuclear power as part of the CO2-free mix in a brief\u00a0video<\/a>, but parts of it still felt to me like \u201cindustry propaganda\u201d \u2013 to the extent that I might be a bit embarrassed if anyone seeing my earlier references<\/a> to the BNC site should subsequently come across it.
\nMy first concern is that very little argument is given to support the claim that non-nuclear options won’t suffice. No-one is likely to be convinced that just because Denmark has not yet<\/em> displaced anything close to the major part of their coal use with wind that they may not eventually do so (though I suspect that in fact they won’t), and the use of that as an apparent argument will just make the case seem weak and forced. Another point that troubles me is at the conclusion where the video compares the golf ball sized lump of nuclear fuel that is capable of providing enough energy to meet the needs of a typical western human lifetime with the many tons of coal that it would “displace”. I suspect that this will seem obviously \u201cunfair\u201d even to those who cannot say why (The only comparison that really matters is with volume of ore rather than volume of fuel).<\/p>\n

Of course is hard to tell the full story so briefly, but if it can\u2019t be done well enough then it were better not done at all. The BNC site has a lot of credibility but the video actually undermines it so I actually hope \u00a0it doesn\u2019t<\/em> “go viral”.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Barry Brooks at ‘BraveNewClimate’ has made a brave effort at summing up the need for nuclear power as part of the CO2-free mix in a brief\u00a0video, but parts of it still felt to me like \u201cindustry propaganda\u201d \u2013 to the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,22],"tags":[208],"class_list":["post-1374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate","category-sustainability","tag-nuclear-power"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1374"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1378,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1374\/revisions\/1378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}