{"id":670,"date":"2010-05-28T10:39:29","date_gmt":"2010-05-28T17:39:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/qpr.ca\/blog\/?p=670"},"modified":"2010-05-28T11:00:53","modified_gmt":"2010-05-28T18:00:53","slug":"article-first-things","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2010\/05\/28\/article-first-things\/","title":{"rendered":"Article | First Things"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An unfortunate link from Arts&amp;Letters Daily led to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firstthings.com\/article\/2010\/04\/believe-it-or-not\">this silly article by David B Hart in First Things<\/a>. The article presents itself as a review of the recently published <em>50 Voices of Disbelief<\/em> but after briefly dismissing a number of the contributions to that effort it goes on to become a general polemic against the so-called &#8220;New Atheists&#8221;. Not that I hold any brief for any of these worthies in particular (in fact I do often find them smug though I seldom agree with the common charge of outright brutish rudeness), but Hart&#8217;s article is full of derisive snorting about failings which he does not substantiate (and which I know are often unfairly ascribed).<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I have to agree with commenter Jack Rawlinson who calls it an &#8220;absurdly and unnecessarily prolix exercise in empty sneering&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Or commenter Eric MacDonald who says:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div class=\"commentText\">What a disturbing piece of intellectual foppery! For someone  who criticises the quality of argument in the writings of the New  Atheists, this diatribe &#8211; for that is what it is &#8211; contains incredibly  little, if any, argument at all &#8211; an astonishing display of rude  confidence in the power of declarative pronouncement. At one point he  offers an analogy to the regress argument, but calls it a feeble one &#8211;  which it is. If Hart is going imperiously, and with an surprising fund  of insulting and belittling language, to condemn others for their  arguments, he must at least provide one or two!<\/p>\n<p> . . .<\/p><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>and later:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>. . .<br \/>\nAs to Hart&#8217;s other claim, that none of the so-called New Atheists seem  to have any sense of the tragic dimension of life, arguments against  religion are scarcely where this will be found. But this profound  dimension of the tragic and of the complexity and depth of human  conscience and self-critical awareness does not depend on belief in god  or gods. Read some Tzvetan Todorov or Vassily Grossman, or even some of  the essays of AC Grayling, and the subtlety and profundity of  regligionless human awareness will be abundantly evident. Hart is  looking in the wrong place, and on that basis proposing that  contemporary atheism is simply empty. But surely, nothing can be quite  so empty as the disparaging hubris of Hart himself, lacking in both  self-critical awareness and human depth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An unfortunate link from Arts&amp;Letters Daily led to this silly article by David B Hart in First Things. The article presents itself as a review of the recently published 50 Voices of Disbelief but after briefly dismissing a number of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/2010\/05\/28\/article-first-things\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=670"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":672,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions\/672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qpr.ca\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}