CRIA’s a liar

Michael Geist – CRIA’s “Unprecedented” Decline points out that the decline in sales bewailed by the Canadian Recording Industry Association in 2006 was due to the departure of several independent labels from the organization and not to file sharing as claimed by the association. But it should be no surprise that the thieves who steal a royalty fee from anyone buying blank media to store personal photos would also stoop to outright lies in order to influence the public.

Posted in copyright | Leave a comment

Michael Geist – Canadians Speak out on Media Diversity

Michael Geist – Canadians Speak out on Media Diversity

I support a policy limiting concentrated and cross-ownership of the media in Canada, and also clearly separating those who control distribution channels from those who produce, aggregate and/or distribute content.

I want a choice in what I see on TV, hear on the radio and read in the newspaper and on the internet, and I do not want any private body to have the power to deny or limit that choice.

The freedom of expression and communication that is essential for democracy is lost when the private holder of a broadcast license can deny the right to purchase advertising on the basis that the proposed message conflicts with those of others to which it is beholden (as happened with the denial of AdBusters anti-car ads a few years ago)- or when the controller of an internet communication channel blocks access to web sites whose message it objects to (as was done more recently by Telus in the context of a labour dispute).

Any public policy seeking to protect diversity in the media must recognize the simple fact that ownership matters, and carries a responsibility to the public interest.

Because this review comes after a wave of media mergers, I call for a policy that forces divestiture by media companies with concentrated holdings in a given market.

I also call for the severance of media producers and aggregators from the control of media distribution channels.

But most importantly, I call for a policy which requires those who control media distribution channels to refrain from any kind of censorship of what is distributed over those channels and to provide access to such channels at the same price for all content producers even (in fact especially) when such content may be detrimental to their own interests.

I want to be assured that my voice will be both heard and counted at all CRTC hearings on these matters.

My email address is: alan@qpr.ca

Posted in arts and culture, canada, social issues | Leave a comment

The Chronicle: 7/13/2007: Banishing the Ghosts of Iran

Commenting on the arrest of Haleh Esfandiari in The Chronicle: 7/13/2007: Banishing the Ghosts of Iran, Fatemeh Keshvarz says “We all wish Esfandiari to be freed, but the danger is that we will color all of Iran…” and goes on to harangue Azar Nafisi for not mentioning enough contemporary Iranian women writers in her story of the travails of an occidophilic women’s reading group in post-revolutionary Tehran. As if the readers of ‘Reading Lolita ..’ will not see the protagonist as well as her oppressors as the ends of a spectrum which includes many other categories in between. Perhaps ‘Reading Lolita..’ is a bit two dimensional (but it certainly allows for more than one!) but is concern about this issue is the most appropriate response to the arrest? Don’t get me wrong. I am interested in trying to see and understand a broader range of Iranian experience, but the context of this complaint is really rather dissonant.

Posted in arts and culture, world | Leave a comment

Dawkins: How dare you call me a fundamentalist

In How dare you call me a fundamentalist the Times online presents an excerpt from Richard Dawkins’ introduction to the paperback edition of ‘The God Delusion’ in which he responds to some critics of the hard cover edition. Continue reading

Posted in religion | Leave a comment

Why Dawkins is Wrong – by D. S. Wilson

Skeptic: eSkeptic: Wednesday, July 4th, 2007

Posted in biology, religion, social issues | Leave a comment

Jim Motavalli at AlterNet on the Nuclear Option?

AlterNet: Environment: Is Fear About Climate Change Causing a Nuclear Renaissance? provides a balanced review including summaries of a number of people’s positions but doesn’t really add any new information.

Posted in climate, social issues, technology | Leave a comment

Video Debate on Nuclear Power

Peter Bradford, Patrick Moore and Jim Riccio debate the future of nuclear power
and why nuclear power cannot solve the climate crisis.

The actual debate linked to from Nuclear Information and Resource Service – NIRS is quite interesting, but the intro (including the above description) and the powerpoint style summary notes alongside the video are a disgrace. They accurately summarise the points made by Riccio and Bradford but distort or contradict those made by Moore. In fact Bradford was the most credible presenter followed pretty closely by Moore with Riccio being just totally unimpressive. I think I’ll cancel my Greenpeace support.

Posted in sustainability, technology | Leave a comment

Telus Lies to Force Images off YouTube

Telus Cleanses Image on YouTube :: News :: thetyee.ca

Although requiring a court order before penalties apply to the carrier would help avert this kind of abuse, the most important thing to do to protect public domain property (as well as that of those without the financial resources to defend what is their own) is to VASTLY increase the penalties for falsely claiming ownership.

Posted in copyright | Leave a comment

mathschallenge.net

mathschallenge.net
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

Posted in education, mathematics, web | Leave a comment

NYTimes Reviews Andrew Keen’s Nonsense

In The Cult of the Amateur – Andrew Keen – Books – Review – New York Times Michiko Kakutani delivers a fawning review of Andrew Keen’s diatribe against open media. According to Kakutani Mr. Keen argues that “what the Web 2.0 revolution is really delivering is superficial observations of the world around us rather than deep analysis, shrill opinion rather than considered judgment.” Well now! and FOX news is delivering something much more valuable I suppose? Further on in the review we hear that ‘Mr. Keen says, “history has proven that the crowd is not often very wise,” embracing unwise ideas like “slavery, infanticide, George W. Bush’s war in Iraq, Britney Spears.” The crowd created the tech bubble of the 1990s, just as it created the disastrous Tulipmania that swept the Netherlands in the 17th century’, but here I have to admit that it may be Kakutani rather than Keen who considers ‘Britney Spears’ to be an ‘idea’ and who blames the internet for the Tulipmania of the 17th century.

Posted in social issues, web | Leave a comment

Climate change: A guide for the perplexed – earth – 16 May 2007 – New Scientist Environment

Climate change: A guide for the perplexed – earth – 16 May 2007 – New Scientist Environment

Posted in climate | Leave a comment

On ‘Reading Lolita in Tehran’

The Common Review: Spotlight

Posted in literature, politics, social issues | Leave a comment

Wesley Freyer on Microsoft software patent implications

Moving at the Speed of Creativity » Blog Archive » Rather than innovate, Microsoft may litigate against open source

Posted in social issues, technology | Leave a comment

squareCircleZ » Another semi-log graph from Alexa – imeem

squareCircleZ » Another semi-log graph from Alexa – imeem

Posted in education, mathematics | Leave a comment

VQR » The Accidental Plagiarist: The Trouble with Originality

This article by Erik Campbell from the Virginia Quarterly Review (via Arts&LettersDaily) starts with Nietzsche’s “Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good “, and touches nicely on a number of ideas – including (again from Nietzsche) “There is always a kind of contempt in the act of speaking.” Indeed, by what right do I assume that anything I say has not been thought by another? or, worse, was not about to come to mind as an independent thought but for my theft of that pleasure in order to satisfy a greed for priority?

In the course of the essay, poet Stephen Dunn’s lines “Our cats like God have never spoken/A word that wasn’t ours” come in as just an example of something accidentally claimed by Campbell as his own invention, but for me they strike a particular chord as they express something I often feel needs to be put forward.  So I can imagine suffering Campbell’s fate myself in the future with regard to those words in particular.

Posted in social issues | Leave a comment

Media Company Thieves

Michael Geist – Canadians Overpay Millions on Private Copying Levy

Posted in canada, copyright | Leave a comment

OLPC&CoL

This from Stephen Downes is, for me, a reminder to consider whether any of my stuff might be useful One Laptop Per Child and/or the Commonwealth of Learning.

Posted in education, mathematics, web | Leave a comment

An Orthogonal Trajectory

Light and Dark

These words (used in the previous post) need exploring. We are not nocturnally well adapted so naturally fear the dark. This leads to much weight being attached to the words and makes their metaphorical use a powerful tool in discourse. But that use reinforces an association that is false and wrong in other contexts. Should it be avoided? How can we avoid the negative effects without giving up much of the richness of our language?

Note also the negative implications of pallor (esp in China) and darkenss as robustness or strength. Would striving for more balanced use of  metaphor save both ends? How can this be encouraged without introducing a tone of moralistic political correctness?

Posted in psychology, social issues | Leave a comment

The Strange Death of Multiculturalism

Ian Buruma, in an article for Project Syndicate, discusses (with implied approval) the decline of “multiculturalism” as a dominant ethic in Europe (especially the Netherlands) as increasing secularism has blurred traditional religious distinctions, and some consequent challenges arising from the relationship between secular Europe and its Muslim immigrants. He argues, as I have, that “Liberal democracy and Islam are reconcilable”, and further that “By defending Enlightenment values in a dogmatic way Europeans will be the ones who undermine them.”

“The reason for defending Enlightenment values is that they are based on good ideas, and not because they are ‘our culture.’ To confuse culture and politics in this way is to fall into the same trap as the multiculturalists.”

In this view it appears that the real culture war is not between Christendom and Islam but between enlightenment and darkness. That there is much that is dark in the modern Muslim world should not lead us to forget that is arguably the brightness and (relative) tolerance of the ancient Muslim world that sparked the European enlightenment. And conversely, we surely cannot fail to see the rising tide of darkenss represented by Bushite fundamentalist Christianity in America.

Perhaps the forces of darkness on both “sides” are, once again, proclaiming and using the East-West split to divert attention from the entirely different direction on which the real “war” is progressing.

“We” all understand this but seem to consider it too obvious or trivial to mention. And so we still let it happen.

Posted in religion, social issues | 1 Comment

UK vs Chinese Math Tests

BBC NEWS reports British chemists as pointing out the difference between an admission test for Chinese science undergrads and a UK university’s diagnostic test for incoming students. But perhaps they are comparing Chinese apples with British oranges (or vice versa?)
After all, in the Chinese question (assuming that by “square prism” they mean “right prism” – which is what it looks like) part (ii) could be on the senior level of our own BC high school math contest (and so could the rest if our high school students had any exposure to vectors), and the UK one could be a soft pitch from our Langara  Math Diagnostic Test.

Posted in education, mathematics | Leave a comment