Roger Pielke Jr. has a long history of what some see as casting doubt on the need for prompt reduction of our CO2 emissions but which he categorizes just as exposing false and/or misleading claims (and sometimes even scientific malpractice) by advocates of climate action.
He does not deny either the reality of anthropogenic global warming or the need for prompt action to reduce our emissions, but many of his followers do and he seems to make little effort to discourage them.
This raises a conundrum in my mind regarding my ongoing concern with how we should react to wrong arguments for things that are true.
It is important to reject false arguments for things that are true but if the true facts are important then it is also necessary to always accompany the exposure of a false argument with a correct and convincing argument for the same conclusion.
Source: Why Climate Misinformation Persists – by Roger Pielke Jr.